[Maypole] Maypole model inheritance

[Dave Howorth]

Simon Flack wrote:
> Yes, I like that. One issue is that the table2class() differs from 
> Class::DBI::Loader. E.g.

I prefer AutoLoader's rule, but I guess one issue might be backwards 
compatibility.

> table: hello-world
> CDBI::AutoLoader: HelloWorld
> CDBI::Loader: Hello-world    # this is an invalid package name

So there's no backwards-compatibility issue there then :)

> table: hello__world
> CDBI::AutoLoader: HelloWorld
> CDBI::Loader: Hello_World

That will either work, if the user hasn't actually written any code for 
the table class, or it will cause a compile error that's easy to fix in 
the more usual case that there is code for an untaint or a relationship 
or something.

The most worrying case I can think of is if somebody has one table 
called hello__world and another called hello_world. But then I think 
they deserve everything that happens to them :) And something would 
probably break.

The other issue will be Class::DBI::Loader::Relationship.

Cheers, Dave