[Maypole] CDBIL::Relationship query

[Mike Wangu]

Thank you, Perrin.

I concur.

Apologies for the delay in responding.

>From: Perrin Harkins <perrin@elem.com>
>To: Mike Wangu <mwangu@hotmail.com>
>CC: Maypole List <maypole@lists.netthink.co.uk>
>Subject: Re: [Maypole] CDBIL::Relationship query
>Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 13:19:17 -0400
>
>On Fri, 2004-05-28 at 03:57, Mike Wangu wrote:
> > I have setup my table classes manually using Class::DBI and I am happy 
>with
> > that. I came across Class::DBI::Loader::Relationship in the Maypole 
>examples
> > and that looks a more maintainable way of setting up the underlying 
>classes
> > for an application.
>
>Okay, I see what you're after now.  Given that neither you nor I can
>figure out how to express this simple relationship with C::D::L::R, I'd
>say it's probably not going to be more maintainable.  I would stick with
>standard Class::DBI semantics.
>
>- Perrin
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get fast, reliable Internet access with MSN 9 Dial-up – now 3 months FREE! 
http://join.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200361ave/direct/01/