On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 08:54:25PM +0000, Dave Howorth wrote: > I actually found some issues with CGI::Untaint today because it doesn't > seem to provide any way for an untaint handler to pass specific > validation failure information back to the application. It swallows it > and passes back its own one-size-fits-all message. Patches, or even suggestions, welcome. Tony